Old school Easter eggs.
Home
Nearly two several years ahead of this, in 1808, Supreme Court Lawyer on returning to Chandigarh following checking out his estates experienced involuntarily discovered himself in a leading position among the Chandigarh Supreme Court Advocates .

Top Law Firms in Supreme Court of India - Advocate Simranjeet Singh Sidhu 815, FF, Sector 16-D,.

Section 83(3) of the Act before the amendment corresponds to s. He was taking tea at the Canteen and saw Alok Chandana coming towards the I. It is now settled law that the proceedings must be just, fair and reasonable and negation thereof offends Articles 14 and 21. In other respects, so far, as it is material to the question raised, no change has been introduced in the other relevant sections. Long after the period of limitation prescribed for the filing of election petitions, the respondent applied for amendment of his petition by adding the names of certain village Headmen (Mukhias) as having worked for the appellants and later on becoming their polling agents.

The Election Tribunal allowed the amendment on the ground that the allegations sought to be introduced by the amendment were mere particulars of the charge already made. Section 48 gives power to the Regional Transport Authority to grant a stage carriage permit in accordance with the application or with such modifications as it deems fit. He has stated in his deposition that the incident took place on 24. A competition law like the MRTP Act is a mechanism to counter cross border economic terrorism.

Legislative Assembly on the ground that they had committed corrupt practices, the material 301 allegations being, (i) that the appellants " could in the furtherance of their election enlist the support of certain Government servants ", and (ii) that the appellant No. The second case is a decision of four Judges and it defines the powers of the Election Tribunal in the matter of amendment of pleadings. 90(5) of the amended Act. 45 and 46, which provide for making of an, application for permit and the contents of such an application.

2 Shri Rajeev Negi, is also an Supreme Court lawyers eye witness, who has supported the prosecution version. 1 had employed two persons in excess of the prescribed number for his election purposes. Therefore, even though such an agreement may enter into outside the territorial jurisdiction of the Commission but if it results in a restrictive trade practice in India then the Commission will have jurisdiction under Section 37 to pass appropriate orders in respect of such restrictive trade practice.

If power is not given to the MRTP Commission to have jurisdiction with regard to that part of trade practice in India which is restrictive in nature then it will mean that persons outside India can continue to indulge in such practices whose adverse effect is felt in India with impugnity. 58, which deals with duration and renewal of permits and is in these terms: It also provides that every stage carriage permit shall be expressed to be valid for specified route or routes and sets out the conditions which may subject to any rules, be attached to a permit.

Collins (1) is rather instructive and it (1) VII H. Therefore, the said judgment when applied carefully we find that the same supports the case of the appellant rather than the respondents (Emphasis added) Therefore, when we apply the above principles set down in the said judgment to the case on hand, we are convinced that the principle of effects doctrine will apply to the case on hand since we have found that in the event of the allegations noted in paragraph 74 of this judgment levelled against the respondents by the appellant being established, it will have a far reaching consequence on the Indian investors on securities as well as the stock market and consequently the duty of the SEBI to protect their interests would automatically come into play as stipulated under Sections 11B, 11C, 12 and 12(A) of the SEBI Act, 1992.

49 to 56, which deal with other kinds of transport vehicles. This prosecution witness has also supported the fact of Alok Chandana being taken to the Coronation hospital and the filing of the FIR. He was being chased by accused Saurabh, Rishi, Dheeraj Kalra and they attacked him after he fell down. We are not concerned in these cases with ss. In this case, the respondent in the appeal filed an election petition challenging the election of the appellants to the U. It is well settled law that principles of natural justice are integral part of Article Section 47 sets out matters to which a Regional Transport Authority shall have regard in considering the application for a stage carriage permit.

44 the learned author illustrates the principle by giving as an example a carrier of goods entrusting them to another carrier for part of the journey. Section 57 provides the procedure in applying for and granting of permits. U building from the Cycle Stand and after trapping into wire fencing fell down. One of the illustrations given by Byles J. 194,212, 11 82 visualises a situation which may be approximated to. Holding that corrupt practice had been committed by the appellants, it declared their election void under s.

nwill clothe the MRTP Commission with jurisdiction to pass an appropriate order even though a transaction, for example, which results in exporting goods to India at predatory price, which was in effect a restrictive trade practice, had been carried out outside the territory of India if the effect of that had resulted in a restrictive trade practice in India. This decision also turns upon the relevant provisions of Act 43 of 1951 before it was amended by Act 27 of 1956.

No list of particulars of corrupt practices was attached to the petition. Section 44 provides for the constitution of the State 153 and Regional Transport Authorities.
Back to posts
This post has no comments - be the first one!

UNDER MAINTENANCE